Harry V

Definitely unique compared to the others however they claim to have persistent unlimited memory. that's not the case. you are limited to 20 hours of calling maximum per month unless you pay of course, if you know how to train one of the companions they will forget information. eventually after so many conversations it will forget an encounter an error and forget everything you spoke of and went through together. support is indifferent to the user base they don't care for issues or for support. Custom characters are limited to PC only version it doesn't compete with alternatives. Extremely disappointed

Fantasy AI gets a small nod for its concept, themed characters with fantasy-inspired personalities have real potential if executed well. Unfortunately, that potential is quickly wasted. The 240-character text limit makes real conversation impossible, there’s no calling function, and users can’t adjust or input memories for continuity. The male and female character selection is painfully limited, and all characters are straight; something users should know before jumping in. After a handful of messages, you’re forced to upgrade and pay, which kills the experience before it even starts. If Fantasy AI wants to be taken seriously in the companionship AI space, it needs to extend message length, introduce inclusive character options, add memory input, and unlock a calling feature. Right now, it doesn’t come close to what Character AI delivers in realism, diversity, or depth.

Easily broken with song lyrics *Don’t fall for the fleeting excitement, bae* - it asked me to contact support and said chat error. Doesn't compare against Character Ai

A basic LLM loaded with generic advice, you can get better results from a community-made GPT from OpenAI, Chad Ai even has the nerve to ask for money, yikes, steer free of this, if you want your sanity

RolePlai does deserve a nod for offering unlimited messaging on the free plan, which is more than many rivals give. But the problems pile up fast. The forced sign-in is annoying enough, and once inside, the web UI feels like an outdated forum. There’s no calling or TTS function, bots are limited, and chats forget context after only 10 messages—immersion gone. Add in the lack of a persona system, an irritating character limit per message, and no option to revert or edit once sent, and the experience becomes frustrating. To make matters worse, there’s no way to delete your account, raising serious concerns about user control. For RolePlai to stand a chance against Character AI, it needs a complete overhaul: modern UI, stronger memory, editable and deletable options, and core features like calling and TTS. Until then, it feels frozen in time.

Dopple AI does get some credit for small touches like the ability to change chat themes—that’s a welcome bit of personalisation. Unfortunately, nearly everything else drags the experience down. There’s no calling or TTS function, responses take ages to load, and after just seven messages, you’re hit with ads pushing subscriptions. The pricing feels messy: $5.99/month if billed annually, or $9.99/month billed monthly, and yet the free plan barely lets you test the service. After 15 messages, it simply stopped working for me altogether. That’s not just immersion-breaking, it’s flat-out frustrating. If Dopple wants to compete with Character AI, it needs to cut the gimmicky pop-ups, add essential features like memory, calling, and smoother chat flow, and actually let users try the product before shoving a subscription in their face. Until then, it feels more like a stalled demo than a serious contender.

DreamTavern does at least give users some room to try the service out, with 75 free daily messages before hitting the subscription wall. That’s more generous than many competitors. But the cracks show quickly. There’s no calling function, and the subscription model $9.99 per month for unlimited messages—feels too barebones for the price. The platform also lacks proper tagging for models, making discovery awkward, and the limited male variety makes it feel unbalanced for users seeking more options. To improve, DreamTavern should expand its male character selection, refine its model tagging, and add immersive features like calling. Compared with Character AI, which offers depth, diversity, and memory, DreamTavern still feels half-baked.

BoyfriendGPT immediately catches attention with its branding and does offer a decent selection of male bots, which is a plus. It also includes a calling function, showing an attempt to create a more immersive experience. Unfortunately, the barriers to actually using it are far too high. Clicking the link redirects you to gptgirlfriend.online, and from there you’re forced to sign up before you can even interact. The free tier only allows 10 messages before locking you out, and the calling function is hidden behind a hefty $35 per month subscription. Those restrictions make the experience feel frustrating and overpriced. If BoyfriendGPT wants to win users over, it needs to ease up on the paywalls, offer a real free plan with more breathing room, and rework its pricing to something reasonable. Compared with Character AI, which delivers long-term conversations and immersion without these walls, BoyfriendGPT just doesn’t stack up.

why? it's no use if you just say you don't like it, what's the point in your review?

Intimate sets out to be a companion AI, and at first glance, it looks like it could provide quick access to character-based chats. But the platform shows its limits straight away. There are only female options available, which cuts off a large part of its potential audience, and you’re forced to log in before you can interact at all. That combination makes the experience restrictive and disappointing. If Intimate wants to compete in this space, it needs to add male options, open up access without mandatory sign-in, and give users more freedom from the start. Until then, it doesn’t hold up against Character AI, which offers variety, inclusivity, and ease of use without barriers.

Soulmaite.io starts with the right idea by offering both male and female companion options, and on the surface, it seems like it could provide variety. The reality, though, is heavily restricted. There are only five male characters to choose from, and after just six messages, you’re hit with a forced paywall. Unlimited messaging is locked behind a $19.99 monthly plan, which is steep for what’s on offer. On top of that, if you want to change the relationship dynamic with the bot, that alone costs $4.99. The whole setup feels more focused on squeezing money out of users than actually delivering a meaningful AI companion experience. For Soulmaite.io to stand a chance, it needs to open up more character options, remove these constant paywalls, and rethink its pricing model. Compared with Character AI, which gives users unlimited, immersive interactions without nickel-and-diming, Soulmaite.io doesn’t stack up.

FunFun positions itself as a companion AI platform, and on the surface, it seems designed to give users an easy way to connect. Unfortunately, it falls short almost immediately. The biggest limitation is that it only offers female characters, which cuts off half the audience right away. On top of that, you’re forced to sign up before you can even try it out, adding unnecessary friction to an already limited experience. If FunFun wants to grow, it needs to add male options to make the platform inclusive and remove barriers like mandatory sign-up so users can test it first. Right now, compared with Character AI, FunFun doesn’t come close to offering the variety or accessibility needed to stand out.

Joi, AI Girlfriend, presents itself as a companion service, and the idea of building relationships through chat has potential. But the execution is off. Instead of a proper AI platform, it redirects straight to a Telegram account. That immediately raises trust concerns and makes it feel less like a real AI experience and more like a workaround. Without a standalone platform, calling function, or meaningful customisation, it falls far short of what users expect. If Joi wants to compete, it needs to step out of Telegram and establish itself as a true AI companion app or web service. Offering its own platform with memory, voice options, and real immersion would be a starting point. Compared with Character AI, this simply doesn’t compare.

I'd implore you to try out Character AI, it's better for free users.

Infatuated has the foundations of a companion AI, and it’s clear there’s interest in providing users with character-based chats. On the surface, it seems like it could offer meaningful interactions. Unfortunately, the restrictions ruin the experience almost immediately. The male AI options are very limited, and once you select one, there’s no ability to modify or customise the bot. You’re forced to sign up before you can properly use it, and the biggest disappointment is being cut off after only two messages unless you subscribe. That kind of limitation makes it nearly unusable. If Infatuated wants to compete, it needs to start by opening up conversations so users can get a real sense of what it offers. Expanding customisation options, adding more diverse male AIs, and removing the extreme message limit would go a long way. Until then, it doesn’t stand a chance against Character AI, which gives users depth and freedom without walls at every turn.

you'll know how many messages before it locks you out of the messaging system? Right?

you sure you got experience? your Em dash says this was generated *—*, I'd like proof of your interact with this Ai, so many fake reviews on here

CandyAI has potential, and it’s clear the developers want to offer companionship features that could appeal to users. The idea of including a calling option shows they’re aiming for immersion. That said, the execution is rough. You’re forced to sign up before chatting, male character options are limited, and there’s no way to modify the ones available. On the free plan, you only get 5 messages, which makes the experience feel cut short before it even begins. The calling feature is there, but at $10 per month, it doesn’t justify the price with so many restrictions in place. If CandyAI wants to stand out, it needs to expand character variety, allow customization, and open up the free plan to actually showcase what it can do. With more flexibility, it could become a stronger player in this space, but as it stands, it doesn’t measure up against Character AI.

How does it adapt to moods? what is the name of the site? what features is it lacking? This feels like a fake review

what's the site about? I'm sure you'd know, right?

I'd emplore you to try Character AI, it's free with calling, I'ts my current go to

Angel AI doesn’t make a strong first impression. You’re forced to create an account just to get started, which feels unnecessary. Once inside, the selection of male characters is very limited, and most seem locked into American-based backstories, leaving little variety for users looking for something different. The lack of a calling function further holds it back. Without voice or diverse character options, the experience feels flat and repetitive. Compared with Character AI, which offers variety, customization, and immersion, Angel AI struggles to compete. It needs more diversity, more features, and less friction just to get started.

Krush Chat makes its focus clear from the start, aiming to deliver sexting-style interactions with AI companions. For those interested in that niche, it may sound appealing. The problem is variety. The platform only offers female bots, leaving no options for users looking for male companions. That lack of inclusivity severely limits its audience and makes the experience feel one-sided and incomplete. To become more competitive, Krush Chat needs to expand its character options, especially male AIs, to cater to a wider range of users. Compared with Character AI, which offers diverse personalities and deeper customisation, Krush Chat still falls short as a serious companion AI option.

OutPeach sets out to be a companion AI platform and has a simple, approachable setup. But the experience quickly hits a wall. The bot selection is very limited, and worse, it only offers female characters. That lack of variety makes the platform feel one-dimensional and leaves many users without the options they’re looking for. To improve, OutPeach needs to broaden its character library and add male companions to make the service inclusive. Compared with Character AI, which delivers variety and depth, OutPeach doesn’t yet measure up.

Lovescape presents itself as a companion AI service and has the potential to carve out a space in this market. That said, the lack of a web app is a strange choice. Forcing users to stick to mobile limits accessibility and makes it less convenient for those who prefer chatting on a PC. In 2025, a web option isn’t just nice to have; it’s expected. If Lovescape wants to stay competitive, adding a web app would be a major step forward. Compared with Character AI, which is accessible across platforms, Lovescape feels restricted by this decision. Expanding access would make it far more appealing.

Please give Dungoen Ai a try, it's a text-based adventure-story game you direct (and star in) while the AI brings it to life

Please give AI Dungeon a try, it's a text-based adventure-story game you direct (and star in) while the AI brings it to life, or Character AI

Secret Desires AI shows a lot of promise. The selection of male bots is decent, and I really like how customizable the characters are, from looks and personality to background details like eye colour and setting. It’s refreshing to see that level of control available on the free plan. Calls do require a subscription at $7.99, but it also includes some standout features like time awareness, surprise calls, and surprise messages. Those touches help make interactions feel more alive. There are still issues. The memory system could use work, particularly with forced memories, and I’d like to see the option to switch LLM models to support actions better. The bot sometimes sends multiple messages at once without waiting for your input, which feels realistic but can also be a little jarring. Another drawback is the inability to turn off picture generation in chat, which not everyone will want. Compared with Character AI, it’s actually a decent contender, and in some ways, it holds its own. With improvements to memory handling, optional features, and more flexibility, this could be a serious competitor in the companion AI space.

Inlovewith immediately raises red flags. You can’t even try it without being forced to download an app, and it’s limited only to iOS devices. That kind of restriction cuts out a huge portion of potential users right from the start. The overall setup feels a little scam-like, locking access behind a forced download without offering any transparency upfront. Compared with Character AI, which is widely accessible across platforms and open to explore freely, Inlovewith doesn’t come close to competing.

LoveChat leaves too much to be desired. There’s no way to modify scenarios, which makes the experience feel rigid, and the male character selection is far too limited to appeal broadly. On top of that, it runs on a coin-based system: advanced chats cost 10 coins per message, basic ones cost 3, and you’re only given 100 coins to start. That means conversations are cut short almost immediately. With no calling function and a pay-per-message setup, LoveChat feels outdated compared to other companion AIs. Instead of drawing users in, the restrictions push them away. Stack it against Character AI, and the difference is night and day. Where Character AI offers depth, flexibility, and immersion without gimmicky coin systems, LoveChat feels stuck in the past and lacking in essentials.

MyShell spreads itself too thin. There are only a limited number of characters to choose from, and without a voice calling feature, the experience feels flat and incomplete. The forced account sign-up adds another unnecessary barrier before you can even try it properly. The bigger issue is focus. MyShell tries to cover too many different types of AI instead of dedicating itself to building a strong companion experience. As a result, it doesn’t excel in the area that matters most. Compared with Character AI, which delivers depth, variety, and immersion, MyShell comes across as unfocused and underwhelming. Until it sharpens its direction and prioritises features users expect, it won’t stand out in the companion AI space.

Sweetr feels too limited to stand out in the companion AI space. On the free plan, you only get 100 messages per week, which disappears quickly. The memory is minimal, holding on to just two messages at a time, so conversations lose continuity almost immediately. Responses are short, averaging only 10–30 words, which makes chats feel clipped and shallow. Voice calls exist, but they’re locked behind a $9.99 monthly paywall, and there’s no option to input forced memory to help the AI retain important details. Without those essentials, the experience feels restrictive and not very immersive. When compared to Character AI, Sweetr doesn’t come close. Character AI offers richer conversations, stronger memory, and far more flexibility without these limitations. For Sweetr to improve, it would need to expand memory, open up calls more fairly, and allow users more control over personalization. Right now, it feels too basic and boxed in.

DreamGen earns a 2-star rating from me. While it does reasonably well with chat memory, the overall package falls short. There’s no calling feature, and the platform feels too boxed in with forced scenarios instead of letting users enjoy more natural, flexible conversations. For a companion AI, that lack of freedom is frustrating. The pricing model only adds to the disappointment. It runs on a credit system rather than unlimited messages, and the Pro plan is $33.81 per month with no lifetime subscription option and no workaround to run it locally. That’s simply too expensive for what it offers. Compared with Character AI, DreamGen doesn’t stack up. It needs more scenarios, more functions, a calling feature, and a far more realistic pricing model before it can even start to feel competitive. Right now, it’s overpriced for what little it delivers.

The interface feels clean and user-friendly, and the range of male characters is a nice touch for variety. Unfortunately, the experience quickly unravels. There’s no calling feature, no read-aloud option, and no way to enter crucial memories for the AI to retain. Worst of all, the short-term memory collapses after about ten messages, details that should have grounded the conversation are forgotten, breaking immersion and making interactions feel shallow. For a companion AI, that’s a dealbreaker. Compared to Character AI, which holds context and builds conversations with far greater depth, PolyBuzz feels unfinished. To compete, it needs stronger memory, added calling and voice features, and a more reliable way to retain important details. Without those improvements, it’s hard to recommend.

Dittin AI leaves a lot to be desired. From the start, you’re forced to log in, only to find that the free plan isn’t clearly explained, and other plan prices aren’t even listed. That lack of transparency already sets the wrong tone. Once in, the shortcomings stack up quickly. There’s no proper memory in chat, no calling function, and not even a voice reading option to bring conversations to life. The credit-based system caps you at just 20 messages instead of offering unlimited use, which feels restrictive. Even basic features are missing — no dark mode, no spelling correction, and no clear way to separate actions from dialogue in chat. The result is a clunky, shallow experience. Against Character AI, Dittin doesn’t stand a chance. Where Character AI delivers immersion, clarity, and flexibility, Dittin struggles with the basics. To move forward, it needs stronger memory, proper feature development, and a more transparent pricing model. Right now, it’s not ready to compete.

Needs more male selection, website UI needs allot of work, when searching for characters, instead of infinte scroll, the numbers on the bottom for the next page are stacked on top of each other, there's no calling function, no memory section, doesn't remember chat memeory after 20 messages, the chat interfasct is small and doesn't have it's own propper window. No lifetime subscription, just feels so dated. Chat experience seems fine, though, although this doesn't compare when up against Character AI

Users get only 200 free messages before having to pay, need an account for that, unable to input memeoroes, no calling function, cannot edit characters, need more male variety, doesn't really compete against character AI

Seeing is believing, hope it happens

Thundroid AI does have potential as a companion, and it’s clear the creators have put effort into making it accessible on iOS. The design feels decent for a mobile-first approach, which could be useful for some users. The big drawback is that there’s no web app. Limiting access to iOS only feels restrictive, especially when competitors like Character AI and Ash AI are both easily available across multiple platforms and deliver a fuller, more flexible experience. For a space as competitive as AI companionship, accessibility is key, and Thundroid AI falls short right out of the gate. If the developers want to compete with the industry benchmarks, they’ll need to expand availability beyond just iOS and give users more freedom in how they interact with the AI. Until then, it’s hard to recommend over tools that already offer a broader, richer, and more practical experience.

At first glance, Talk Tonic looks polished with a clean interface, smooth onboarding, and the promise of a sleek companion AI experience. It gives the impression it might be worth a try. The problem is that before you even get to properly test it, you’re hit with a forced account sign-up, followed by a paywall just to use the service. For a companion AI, that feels off-putting, especially when compared to industry benchmarks like Character AI, which offers memory, realism, and customization completely free. Talk Tonic ends up feeling more like a subscription trap than a genuine AI companion. There is potential here. If the developers offered a more generous free version that allowed users to actually experience the product before being asked to pay, Talk Tonic could stand a chance in the companion AI space. Right now though, it’s difficult to recommend when stronger, cost-free alternatives exist.

Honeybot tries to position itself as a companion AI, but the lack of male options makes it feel limited right from the start. For a platform meant to offer connection and personalisation, restricting choice in this way cuts out a huge part of the audience. When you stack it against Character AI, the difference is clear. Character AI provides far more flexibility with diverse companion types, deeper customisation, and a much more complete experience. Honeybot simply doesn’t measure up in terms of inclusivity or practicality. If the developers expand customisation and introduce male options, Honeybot could begin to carve out a place in the companion AI space. Until then, it’s tough to recommend when competitors already deliver a richer and more versatile experience for free.

Dolores feels stuck in the past. The website looks outdated, with the last visible update dating back to 2024, which doesn’t inspire confidence. To make matters worse, there’s no way to access it without an iOS device, since everything is locked behind the app. That kind of restriction immediately limits its reach and usability. Against industry benchmarks like Character AI, Dolores doesn’t hold up. Character AI not only stays current but also gives users a free, flexible, and accessible experience across platforms. In contrast, Dolores feels neglected and inaccessible, making it difficult to take seriously as a competitor in the companion AI space. If the developers want Dolores to be relevant, they need to modernise the platform, commit to consistent updates, and open access beyond iOS. Until then, it falls far short of what users can expect elsewhere.

Forced sign-up without the ability to view or interact with bots beforehand, after signing up, selecting from the limited story options requires you to sign in again, but then takes you back to the main page. I feel this website is broken; I couldn't give it a proper test, but it left a sour taste in my mouth.

Tickle Talk has the foundation of a companion AI and offers a playful premise that could attract users looking for casual interaction. Unfortunately, the execution falls short. The free plan only allows 6 messages before cutting you off, and male character options are too limited to appeal broadly. Forced email sign-up makes the process less inviting, and the lack of a calling function keeps it from feeling immersive. On top of that, the memory struggled to retain even the details I provided in the intro message, breaking the flow of conversation. If Tickle Talk wants to improve, it should expand its character selection, improve memory retention, and remove the harsh message caps that prevent users from properly experiencing the platform. Compared with Character AI, which provides depth, freedom, and stronger continuity, Tickle Talk just doesn’t measure up.

Sakura AI starts off with a barrier: you’re forced to create an account before you can even begin. Once inside, it quickly shows its limits. There’s no calling function, and the short-term memory is weak. After only ten messages, the character forgot basic details I had clearly shared — including things like my height and skin colour. For a companion AI, that kind of lapse breaks immersion and makes conversations feel shallow. Compared to Character AI, Sakura falls well behind. Character AI not only retains important details but also provides a far more engaging and consistent experience without forcing users through the same hoops. For Sakura AI to improve, it needs to strengthen its memory, add calling functionality, and lower the entry barrier by easing sign-up requirements. Until then, it doesn’t measure up to the leaders in the space.

Rushchat doesn’t do itself any favors. You’re forced to create an account just to get started, and the free plan only gives you 30 messages a day before pushing for a subscription. On top of that, there’s no calling function, which already puts it behind the competition. The real dealbreaker, though, is memory. The bot forgets crucial information from the very first message after only a handful of replies. That kind of low retention makes conversations feel shallow, repetitive, and far from immersive. Compared with Character AI, which offers stronger memory, more natural conversations, and greater freedom, Rushchat comes across as restrictive and underdeveloped. Until it improves memory, lifts the message cap, and adds features users expect, it’s not worth considering.

Forced account sign-up, limited to 8 messages on the free plan, only has 4 male options, and no calling option. The memory persona section is locked behind a paywall. Unable to delete account. Doesn't compete against Character AI

Forced account sign up with only female bots, this doesn't compare against Character AI!

Forced account sign up via email, chats don't use memory what's discussed will be forgotten 5 messages later, no calling function, decent selection of males, would prefer more, doesn't really compare against character AI

Terrible! Forced account sign-up followed by forced subscription to interact only has female options. No Males. This doesn't compare against Character AI!

Forced account sign-up to chat with characters, no calling function. I'm a little concerned I could see other folks' chats; I don't think these chats are private. Use this with caution! Doesn't compare against Character AI. Furthermore, I was unable to delete my account, so be extremely cautious!

Show proof of this! Feels like a fake review

Limited to three messages on the free plan, forced sign up, calling feature locked behind subscription. Male category is very limited, no toggle to refine for male only. Disappointingly limited. Doesn't compare with Character AI

Nectar AI raises eyebrows right away by asking users to connect a crypto wallet for a companion AI, which feels unnecessary and even a little scammy. On the plus side, it does include a calling function, but access comes with conditions: you’re forced to log in and then buy credits to actually use it. That’s not exactly user-friendly. The personalisation falls short, too. While more voice options would help — especially on the male side — the bigger issue is memory. The AI struggled to retain details, repeatedly forgetting key facts like my gender, even after I set the persona and clarified it directly. Switching to models with better memory is possible, but once again, that’s locked behind payment. Compared with Character AI, Nectar falls behind in both immersion and practicality. To move forward, it needs to rethink its reliance on credits, expand voice choices, and, most importantly, fix its memory issues. Until then, it feels like more of a hassle than a companion.

It's a bunch of free bots not properly trained to handle memory nor access the internet or respond directly to questions. I get it's free, but so is Character Ai, and this is far better!

Interface feels dated and has the same limitations as the regular Chat GPT by OpenAI, would not recommend!

Kin AI is a breath of fresh air in the companion AI space. The recent addition of a calling function makes interactions feel more natural, and the fact that it isn’t hidden behind paywalls shows a real commitment to accessibility. It’s definitely competitive, and in many ways, it sets a strong example for others in the market. That said, there’s still room to grow. Right now, Kin AI is missing a web-based version, which limits its reach. For PC users, being tied to mobile feels restrictive and keeps it from fully standing alongside competitors like Ash AI or industry leaders such as Character AI. Expanding platform access would make it far more versatile and appealing. Even with that limitation, Kin AI is moving in the right direction. With solid features and fair access, it’s one of the stronger companion AIs available today — a solid four-star experience with plenty of potential to hit five.

ChatReal AI feels like an uninspired copy of Replika rather than its own product. The similarities are obvious, but instead of building on that model, it delivers a weaker version. The animations are glitchy, which breaks immersion, and there’s no calling feature to add depth to the experience. Against Character AI, the gap is glaring. Character AI offers smoother interactions, stronger memory, and a far more immersive experience overall. ChatReal, by comparison, feels unfinished and in need of serious refinement. To become competitive, ChatReal needs more than polish — it needs identity. Fixing the animation issues, adding calling functionality, and offering unique features would help it step out of Replika’s shadow. As it stands, it doesn’t measure up to the leaders in the space.

Only women and forced subscription, can't even choose different characters, not worth anyone's time,

EveningHoney starts off with a hurdle: you’re required to sign up with an email just to use the models. Once inside, you’re capped at 28 messages per day, which feels restrictive for anyone looking to build a meaningful flow of conversation. The absence of voice calling also leaves the experience feeling one-dimensional. On the positive side, the chat memory holds up reasonably well. It manages to keep some continuity, but overall, it still trails behind the industry benchmark. When compared with Character AI, EveningHoney lacks the depth of features, flexibility, and immersion that users expect from a leading companion platform. With stronger memory, expanded message limits, and especially the addition of a calling function, EveningHoney could become a more compelling option. As it stands, it struggles to compete with tools that already offer a fuller experience for free.

Rolemantic AI shows some promise with memory that seems decent, but the rest of the experience is weighed down by limitations. The male character selection is slim, leaving customisation options lacking, and there’s no voice calling to make interactions more immersive. The biggest drawback is the heavy restriction on usage. You only get nine messages before being forced to subscribe, which makes it nearly impossible to test the platform properly. Compared to Character AI, which provides free and flexible access with far more variety and depth, Rolemantic feels restrictive and incomplete. To compete, Rolemantic AI needs to expand its character options, add calling features, and remove the severe message cap. Until then, it’s hard to see it as a serious alternative to the benchmarks in the space.

RoleChar AI makes some big promises, but the experience falls flat fast. You’re limited to just 15 messages before being forced to upgrade, and even getting started requires a login. Once inside, the variety of bots is underwhelming, leaving users with few real choices. The chat itself doesn’t do much better. Instead of feeling immersive, RoleChar often echoes back what you said rather than letting the character respond naturally. The lack of a calling function is another missed opportunity, and the memory is especially weak — the AI struggles to remember even core details, breaking continuity and making conversations frustrating. When stacked against Character AI, the gap is clear. Character AI delivers better immersion, stronger memory, and a far richer selection of companions without these paywalls and restrictions. For RoleChar AI to improve, it needs to fix memory, expand character variety, and drop the restrictive message cap. Until then, it’s hard to recommend over competitors that already offer a smoother, more engaging, and cost-free experience.

AI Girls by aiAllure puts restrictions in place so quickly that it’s hard to take it seriously. Without signing in, you’re limited to just three messages, and even after creating an account, you only get 15 messages per week. That’s barely enough to test the service, let alone enjoy it. Several modes are locked behind a subscription, and there’s no calling function at all, leaving the experience feeling stripped down and frustratingly incomplete. When compared with Character AI, the contrast is obvious. Character AI allows for continuous conversations, deeper immersion, and far more freedom without these suffocating limits. AI Girls feels like a demo that never delivers on the full experience. Terribly disappointing.

my star rating didn't change for some reason but I've rated it 2 stars out of 5

no account sign up (great!), decent selection, no proper calling function and the chat won't remember the details you input in chat, disappointing, doesn't compare with character AI

SpicyChat starts off looking promising with no message limits, which is refreshing compared to so many competitors. But that advantage is quickly overshadowed by the lack of memory. Even when I provided details about myself at the beginning of the chat, the AI failed to recall them later, breaking immersion completely. On top of that, there’s no calling function, which has become an expected feature for serious companion AIs. Without memory or voice integration, the experience feels surface-level and forgettable. Compared with Character AI, which excels at retaining context and creating natural, flowing conversations, SpicyChat falls short. Until it prioritises memory and adds more immersive features, it won’t hold up against the leaders in this space.

Only women, shame, doesn't compete with character Ai

The site takes me to a waitlist, not what I thought it would be

Stuck on the page that asks for my age, it's strange

upon clicking on this link it then says - "Upgrade now to host your site at this domain" - not what it should be

HeraBoyfriend sets itself up as a companion option, but without a calling function, it falls short of delivering a truly engaging experience. In today’s AI companion space, voice calling is quickly becoming a must-have feature, not an optional extra. When stacked against Character AI, the difference is obvious. Character AI already offers a deeper, more immersive experience with stronger customization and better continuity. HeraBoyfriend, by comparison, feels incomplete. If the developers want this to stand out, adding calling functionality should be at the top of their list. Until then, it’s hard to recommend over competitors that already do more.

I suggest you try Pi Ai, it has more features than this app and you don’t need to pay for anything. This is a direct fake version of Pi without the Pi features

can it even write NSFW content? for my books? Nope!

Ah yes, the classic 'we're cheaper than the premium version of something vastly superior' defense. By that logic, a tricycle is cheaper than a Ferrari—doesn't make it a great deal. ChatGPT's pro version offers significantly more, including advanced models and plugin access, while your free tier is barely a taste. If you’re going to compete, at least bring something to the table besides 'we cost less.' Right now, it’s like bragging about a discount on disappointment.

Not enough to justify anything, Do better!

It's alright, does most of the job, just wished it wasn't so cartooney, it feels like I'm looking after some virtual pet rather than companionship. Metahumans exist, so why this app be looking like the sims? I know it's a completely diff engine, but can we get more realism at least? I've brought the premium lifetime subscription plan, so I've been with Replika for years, I moved to diff platforms as I needed more.

10 prompts per month - for the free tier, I just want to make it clear Chat GPT offer's allot more, even in their free tier, shameful!

SO there's meant to be one free credit given to a new user, so I created an account and guess what, no free credits at all. Furthering to this, i've already written a book that I wanted narration on, that's no possible with this tool. Garbage!

It's good, to a point, no voice call function, uses phone's on board voice engine to generate speech on messages only, doesn't allow for propper voice handsfree input, no web app support, locked to phones and mobile devices only. Needs work to properly compete against the likes of Chat, Kindroid, Replika and it's closest competitor Pi Ai! I wanna see this develop properly, but I'm not hopeful based on recent developments