hoo glad to hear that I might give your product a second chance

don't need to say more

Nice try defending your overpriced tool, but your analogies are completely off-base. Canva vs Photoshop? They serve DIFFERENT purposes - Canva for quick social media graphics, Photoshop for professional editing. Both have their place. Grammarly vs Word? Again, DIFFERENT use cases - one's a writing assistant, the other's a document editor. But BoothAI vs free AI headshot generation? That's the SAME use case with wildly different pricing. You claim it "fine-tunes on your actual face" - cool story, but ChatGPT can generate professional headshots that look like specific people when given proper prompts and reference images. Leonardo.ai has face training features. Midjourney does consistent character generation. The "GPU costs" argument is laughable when these platforms offer it for FREE or pennies per image. Your $20/month for "professional headshots" is pure exploitation of people who don't know how to write proper prompts. If someone can't figure out how to ask ChatGPT to "create a professional LinkedIn headshot of a [description] person in business attire with studio lighting," that's a skill issue, not a reason to pay 200x more. The fact that you're comparing your basic face-swap service to industry-standard tools like Photoshop shows how out of touch you are. At least own up to what you're really selling: convenience for people too lazy to learn basic AI prompting. Don't dress it up as some revolutionary technology. Pro tip: Instead of getting defensive, maybe offer actual value that justifies the premium pricing. Right now, you're just an expensive middleman.

Actually nails the viral meme trend perfectly - This is what happens when someone actually understands internet culture instead of chasing AI buzzwords. The tool perfectly captures the absurd "Italian Brainrot" meme phenomenon that's exploding on TikTok and social media. The generated images are genuinely funny and capture that specific surreal aesthetic kids are obsessing over. The pseudo-Italian naming system is brilliant and the variety of styles (anime, 3D, realistic) shows real thoughtfulness. Unlike most meme generators that feel forced, this one produces content that actually looks like it belongs in the trend. Fast generation, free access, and results that people will actually share - sometimes simple concepts executed well beat overcomplicated AI platforms.

Interesting concept ruined by no free trial policy - The idea of testing landing pages against AI agents is actually clever and forward-thinking as AI-driven purchases will likely increase. The multi-agent approach (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek) shows serious technical consideration. However, the complete lack of free trial or demo is a massive red flag. Asking people to pay $29 monthly without seeing any results first is tone-deaf, especially for a new, unproven tool. The pricing feels arbitrary - why $29 for 5 reports when you could manually ask ChatGPT similar questions for free? The concept has potential but the execution screams "cash grab before proving value." Without social proof, reviews, or trial access, it's impossible to recommend spending money on this gamble.

Expensive scam when free alternatives exist everywhere - This is exactly the kind of predatory pricing that gives AI tools a bad name. Charging $20/month for AI headshots when ChatGPT generates images for FREE, Bing Creator is FREE, and Leonardo.ai offers generous free tiers is absolutely ridiculous. The "studio-quality" results are mediocre at best with obvious AI artifacts that any recruiter will spot instantly. The whole business model relies on people not knowing about free alternatives. Save your money - ask ChatGPT to create a professional headshot instead, or use any of the dozen free AI image generators. This is pure exploitation of AI newcomers who don't know better. Complete rip-off.

Generic AI builder with overhyped promises - Trickle follows the same tired formula as dozens of other AI website builders flooding the market. The "turn ideas into apps" tagline sounds impressive until you see the cookie-cutter templates and limited customization options. Sure, it works for basic landing pages, but calling these "apps" is a stretch. The visual canvas is decent but nothing revolutionary - you've seen this interface in Webflow years ago. At $20/month, you're paying premium prices for what's essentially a glorified template generator with AI sprinkles. The built-in database sounds fancy but is just basic form collection. For serious projects, you'll quickly hit the platform's limitations and wish you'd learned proper development instead.

Interesting concept but disappointing execution - The idea of turning reports into websites is good, but the reality is less impressive. The “beautiful websites” promised look like WordPress templates from 2015. It feels like the entire tool was developed with AI, resulting in a generic and uninspiring design. The reports generated lack personality and modern aesthetics. For the price charged (up to $50/month), one would expect better than an amateur website generator. The tool works but doesn't revolutionize anything—it's just a layer of packaging on top of classic content generation.

it was better before gpt-5 arrived now you can't acces to older moder today they add dpt-4o whaouu but where is the other model you force us to use gpt-5 which for me it's not abouti for most of user i don't want to speak for other but just look around beside that you made something incredible add remove the separation between codex sora un chatgpt and give us back old model and you are the goat

not the best ai beacause it's you need to write almost the entire meme and image are very limited you very often see the same image for your meme but keep in this direction

people are gonna think i'm working for gamma but no it's just ppt ai are my main tool so i always search for better and here it's good like all other for the text but the for the presentation 2/10 you just used an old ppt theme and you apply text and if you do that yourself you are sure it's better sorry i can't post image but the text is in mess it's cut etc.

as I like to said it's good but gamma is way better and here you have to rework after it so it's good taking a shot but no worse loosing your time

an other dump of gamma but it's work well just it's not spectacular or anything like that all the ai ppt have bad template no beautiful animation like you can see on youtube or thing like that it's sad just add cool template and you become top leader of the market trust me i'm pro in ppt

Do you know gamma it's exactly the same app same ui same ux same interface same icon like bro if you try to copy someone work do it well not like that it's just steeling work lol and it'sssssssss chiness so no one is surprised

like all the other ai coding website all the same ui all the same interface good if you really dont know how a website work