Literature Review
Overview
Literature Review is a GPT developed by Pan Ken Seng to assist with summarizing and reviewing academic papers. This sophisticated tool is designed to simplify complex tasks involved in academic research, chiefly conducting literature reviews.
It operates on the ChatGPT platform. Upon communication with this tool, you could get summaries of academic papers, making it easier to understand the core findings and implications of the research.
The tool is designed to interact in English and Chinese, thus broadening its user base and making academic review process accessible to more people globally.
Literature Review GPT utilizes several command prompts with specific functions: '/find [research topic]' searches for information on a specified research topic, '/LR [upload pdf file]' analyzes and summarizes the content of uploaded pdf files, and '/language ' changes the interaction language to Chinese.
As it works on top of ChatGPT, using Literature Review requires a ChatGPT Plus subscription. This tool offers a significant resource for researchers, academicians, and students alike who require a streamlined process for conducting, summarizing and understanding scholarly literature reviews.
Releases
Top alternatives
-
Ron Jayson🙏 79 karmaMar 1, 2024@Scholarcyeasy to pick up and you get a few free file imports. it gives you results pretty fast, unfortunately i can't find a way to get back to these, they're locked behind the paid service. -
I've tried to find the exact articles via WoS, Google, or Scopus. Despite using a very advised and complicated search query, it was just a waste of time. Perplexity didn't help either. The Jenni AI, which may add useful links when generating text, finds nothing but trash. SciScape gave exactly what I needed from the first query! A couple of fresh relative articles with very exact topics!
-
Such an impressive platform for all of us who are looking for more efficient ways to do the investigation. OpenRead has the potential to solve our problems.
-
Think its a fab tool but why wont it allow you to save your workflows?
-
Not particularly useful and expensive at the same time. Don’t waste your time or money.
-
I’ve been using it for a month now and I have decided to keep it for a year. There definitely are some kinks they can still work out like file management, but it’s very good at it’s core function: it generally does a good job answering questions and most times identifies PDFs automatically and correctly. The browser plugin works great, and it’s very nice that Papers allows you to add your university’s library API so you can automatically download PDFs that are accessible through your institution (sometimes it refuses to download some papers, so you just have to downlow it yourself and manually add it). The iPad and Android apps are serviceable. Every once in a while it will mess up the PDF identification, especially with papers from either very old sources or online-only journals. Things they must work on: * A much better system to annotate PDFs (the post-it type notes are cumbersome). * Introduce a notepad attached to each PDF or some way to easily link and save the AI’s output to the PDF. Currently, you have to add a little post it note and then paste the text there. * Keep the AI answers available after closing the documents. If you close the document by mistake or have several open and wish to close some, the ai conversation will be reset. * I REALLY wish that you could get citations and links to where the info was from extracted from PDFs. Currently, I have found Coral.ai does a much better job of showing you where the info came from and it even highlights it for you. Give it a try, their 30-day no credit card needed trial allowed me to truly test it, and now I’m a yearly subscriber looking forward for new additions and releases.
