Go to section
SpotlightPUNKU.AIAgents
#1 website for AI tools.Used by 80M+ humans.
TAAFT Tutorial
Generate image
Tasks
Generate text
Free mode
Trending
Leaderboard
Characters
Mini tools
New
Featured
Lists
Agents
Requests
Jobs
Map
Newsletter
Starter pack
Free tools
Speech to text
Text translator
Remove background
Settings
Edit profile
My tools
Gallery
Dashboard
Inbox
Get featured
Contact TAAFT
For you
Popular
Job impact index
Most saved
Affiliate program
Submit AI tool
Notification preferences
Glossary
Home
Timeline
My profile
Create tool
Deals
Companies
Models
Robots
Papers
Fundraises
Repositories
Devices
Organizations
Events
Prompt Pack
Merchendise
Credits
APIs
Features
Tools
Countries
Collections
โผ Latest
French
Free mode
100% free
Freemium
Free Trial
Featured matches
-
Hongyu Shen๐ -1 karmaMar 27, 2026@MockoMocko.ai not good for TEF preparation. โ ๏ธ Broken AI Service & No Customer Support [Update: I successfully got all my money back via bank dispute.] I spent $202.72 on Mocko.ai(purchased in Dec, 2025) for TEF preparation, and it is a total failure. The AI is broken โ it marks correct answers as "Wrong" even when they match the audio perfectly. The product does not do what it promises. My Evidence (Screenshots: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GgneM32b3BEMZd7P82tjxnYgDwV37N2_?usp=sharing): 1. 100% Error Rate: I did 5 random tests. Each time, I answered only the first listening question, recorded the audio, took a screenshot then went to result. Every single time, the AI marked my correct answer as "Wrong." 2. Unable to review any listening question in mock exam: The review page crashed with a coding error: "Something went wrong while showing your report. examContext.Provider is missing!" 3. No Correct Answers Provided: In the listening mock exam, the system flags your answers as "Wrong" but doesn't tell you the correct answers. 4. Inaccurate Grading: I recorded a full listening test in mock exam and converted the audio to text. The AI claimed I got 29 wrong (especially a weird pattern from Q3 to Q14). I compared these with ChatGPT and Gemini, and both confirmed that my answers should be 29 correct and 11 wrong. -

-

Verified tools
-
Build your vocabulary with AI-powered flashcards & smart spaced repetition.OpenBuilt this after wasting months on paper flashcards and forgetting most of what I studied. AI-powered flashcards with smart repetition and personalized learning paths, so you just focus on learning. It knows when you're about to forget a word and brings it back at the right time. Works in 9 languages.
-
Very useful tool, especially that it's free and easy to use.
- Spotlight
PUNKU.AIAgents
-
OpenThis is how a language learning app powered by AI should look like. Looking forward to the releasing of dutch as one of the language options to learn! -
10 free leters per day, 5$\month for subscribe
-
I tried a chat section. It's pretty cool, I used another company that's very similar to yours but it didn't recognize speech nearly as well as yours does. The only negative feedback I have for you is the web app seems a little bit buggy on my phone sometimes when you click to hold down for speech it doesn't work very well you have to try it a couple times. I like it though I'm going to try it again.
-
This is hands-down the most engaging language app Iโve ever used. The AI conversations feel real, and the talking avatar makes it fun to practice speaking without anxiety.
Other tools
-
- Didn't find the AI you were looking for?
-
Mega expensive (charged in euro). There's nothing for free...
-
I like it. Based language - english. Some weird machine pronunciation.
-
Claude โ v5.0Claude Fable 5 State-of-the-art on Cognition's FrontierCode eval, scoring highest among frontier models even at medium effort. More token-efficient than prior Claude models. Stripe reported a codebase-wide migration on a 50M-line Ruby codebase done in a day, versus an estimated two-plus months by hand. Highest score of any model on Hebbia's Finance Benchmark (senior-level reasoning), with major gains in document reasoning, chart and table interpretation, and problem solving. IMC reported near-across-the-board top results on trading-analysis evals (factual lookup, conceptual reasoning, root-cause analysis, expected-value analysis). New state-of-the-art for vision tasks. Extracts precise numbers from scientific figures and can rebuild a web app's source code from screenshots alone. Needs less scaffolding: beat Pokรฉmon FireRed with a minimal vision-only harness, where earlier models needed complex helper harnesses. Stays focused across millions of tokens on long-running tasks and improves its outputs using its own notes. With persistent file-based memory in Slay the Spire, performance improved 3x more than Opus 4.8, and it reached the final act 3x more often. Works autonomously for longer than any prior Claude model
-
Open

